____________________________________________________________
Interview with George Estreich
You have both written
memoirs related to your daughters, both of whom were born with Down syndrome.
Why did you feel the need to write about your experiences?
In the beginning, writing the book didn’t feel like a
choice; it was something I had to do. I was trying to make sense of my
experience through writing about it, and to build continuities between the new
life and the old—though I wouldn’t have put it that way then. As the book
evolved, though, my motivations became less immediately personal. I wanted, in
a small way, to join the conversation, to influence the way Down syndrome is
seen.
What do you hope
readers will gain from your memoir and your perspective?
I wanted, and want, to change readers’ minds. Many, whatever
their intentions, have settled beliefs about what Down syndrome is and what the
people who have it are like. Especially when those beliefs were mistaken, I
wanted to challenge them, to replace false answers with truer questions.
That’s why I told the story of a single girl: to question
the idea that one child with Down syndrome can stand for all children. And it’s
why I told my story, spending a fair amount of time on my own misconceptions; I
wanted to show the way in which my mind was changed.
One of the best parts of having the book out in the world is
that I get to meet readers. The book is the beginning of a conversation, or
many conversations, and it’s a true pleasure to continue that conversation with
those who are interested.
You have read each
other's books; in what ways do you think your books are both similar and
different?
For both of us, the arrival of a child with Down syndrome
made us question our assumptions. Both of us felt the need to grapple with our
questions publicly, in writing. Both of our books are deeply personal, and
reveal a great deal about our own reactions to our children, and yet are
circumscribed too: if I had to guess (I haven’t asked), I’d say that Amy Julia
probably shares some of my wariness of memoirs that tell too much, of
self-exposure without revelation.
One obvious difference is that Amy Julia’s writing is framed
in Christian terms, and mine is not. At the same time, both of us are clearly
fond of irreducible mysteries, and may even prefer questions to answers, so
this difference—while significant—is not as huge as it might seem.
What was the most
challenging aspect of telling your story?
Integrating research with storytelling, managing large
structures, and telling the truth without doing harm—or without doing too much
harm.
If you had to write
it all over again, would you change what you said in your book? If so, what
would that be?
Surprisingly, I don’t have anything I really want to change.
But this is less smugness than self-protection: revision is endless, and I want
to write something new.
How did you come up
with the title of your book and how do you think it reflects on the story's
overall message?
The Shape of the Eye came
to me fairly early, maybe a year or two into the project. I mainly like the way
it sounds, and am hoping readers will discover their own connections between it
and the story.
What was your
favorite part in your story?
I’m partial to the descriptions of life before L
aura, particularly the scenes with Ellie in North Carolina;
to the short section about driving across the country with Theresa; and to the
description of “Your Child’s Heart Book.”
What was your
favorite part in Amy Julia/George's story?
There are many things I like—Amy Julia’s honesty, her
thoughtful and complex meditations on the religious significance of her
experience, and her presentation of faith. She is devout and self-searching at
once; to this outsider, at least, it seems that her faith is renewed by
intellect, by questions.
I also very much like Amy Julia’s account of Down syndrome
in the world: the way people struggle to make sense of it, to reassure, or to
reassure themselves. Particularly powerful: the scene at her mother’s book
club, and the scene in which a husband’s colleague urges her to get testing,
and questions her testing decision.
What projects are you
currently engaged in? Any new books from you on the horizon?
For now, I’ve returned to short forms—short essays, mostly,
though I may go back to poems as well. I’m turning over a few ideas for a new
book, but don’t have anything specific or firm enough to report.
What question have
you always wanted to be asked in an interview? How would you answer that
question?
“Now that you’ve won a MacArthur Grant, sold the foreign
rights to your book in thirty-seven countries, and attained book sales more
typically associated with hastily written novels about vampires, to which part
of New Zealand will your family be moving?”
and...
Do you have any questions for the reader?
How has the advent of the e-reader changed your reading
habits? For the better, for the worse, or somewhere in between?
*************************
George, thank you so much. I am deeply honored to host this conversation on this blog.
Readers, by responding George's question, you will be automatically entered in the giveaway for his book, The Shape of the Eye. Please visit With a Little Moxie before midnight on 6/15 to your comment and enter.
Thank you!
- Meriah Nichols